Could JournalismOnline.com save the Marin Independent Journal?

2 June 2009

This morning, my Twitter feed linked to a Neiman Journalism Lab piece by Zachery Seward with more info on how Journalism Online – the paid content startup being organized by Steven Brill, Leo Hindery and Gordon Crovitz – will work. (disclosure: back when Brill’s Content folded, Mother Jones took over its mailing list; I’ve met Leo Hindery on several occasions over the past couple of years – he has no financial relationship with Mother Jones, although that’s not for lack of trying on my part)

Reading just a little bit between the lines, Journalism Online sits on a 3-legged stool (or will when it launches: Brill told Seward they’re still aiming for a fall opener).

Leg one: the cream. Brill and his partners

… believe publishers, by offering a mix of paid and free content, can wring subscription revenue out of 5-10 percent of their existing monthly visitors while maintaining 88 percent of page views and 91 percent of ad revenue.

Okay: 1 out of every 10 or 20 readers is what they’re counting on to pay the freight (through a mix of annual, monthly, and per article payments, apparently).

Leg two: the wall. It’s hard to imagine Journalism Online working unless the big newspaper chains and names play ball. A lot of them. That wall needs to be high and wide. Otherwise: leakage, big time.

And leg three: the hammer. Towards the end of his article Seward briefly reminds us that

David Boies and Ted Olson have been retained by Journalism Online as antitrust counsel and “to formulate negotiating strategies” with search engines and aggregation sites.

Indeed. Makes me wonder if the real story with Journalism Online is this: to renegotiate the ad revenue share with Google and the other big aggregators. Why mess with a gazillion individual end users when you can get so much from so few? Seward doesn’t really get into this: his focus was on Brill’s pitch to newspaper publishers who recently gathered by the Newspaper Association of America outside of Chicago.

So I was thinking: I guess I could see a pay-for-news deal working for the big nationals: The New York Times, the Washington Post, Wall Street Journal. But the local dailies?

Here’s my smell test: Until about six months ago, Rachelle and I subscribed to the Marin Independent Journal (circulation: about 28,500 in a county with a population of 248,096) the afternoon daily that’s served Marin County in one form or another since 1861. We did it for one reason: local news about Marin County. We wanted to know what was going on.

Well, let’s be real: local news in the “IJ” amounts to two or maybe three stories on the front page each day, and then a whole lot of re-purposed PR chatter for the inside “Marin” section. Not too long ago, though, every so often the IJ did come up with a halfway decent investigative piece or expose about life in the county (and Rachelle will tell you, there’s a hidden side to this uber-wealthy county that needs to see the light of day; she works with a lot of folks in serious trouble day in and day out).

We cancelled our sub to the  IJ late last year to save a little bit of money, and because, well, it just didn’t make sense to be paying money for such a paltry level of local news coverage. We cancelled our sub to The New York Times around the same time, too, which was more of a wrenching cultural adjustment for me than a loss in the news of the day (my grandfather taught me lots of things, but three things stand out: read a good newspaper every day, don’t cross a picket line, and never, ever root for an American League team).

These days, the Marin IJ is owned by Dean Singleton’s MediaNews Group, and if Singleton’s words are to be believed, sooner than later online MarinIJ.com readers should expect to have some/most/all of the paper’s local content pushed behind a paywall.

I can’t imagine anyone halfway sane paying money to see what’s behind that wall. It’s true, a Marin-specific, halfway decent quality blog or citizen journalism site has yet to appear, but I think that would be the single most likely outcome of a paywall for the Marin IJ’s local content. I don’t look to the IJ for movie, music or theater listings, restaurant reviews. Not for national news (it’s all wire service anyway). Sports? Sure, if you follow high school sports, but after that, nope.

That’s why I think Steve Outing has it exactly right predicting that Singleton’s paywall plan won’t work. Newspapers, Outing says,

must create new types of high-value, probably niche, content, communities, and/or services that are unique enough that people will be willing to pay for them.

That’s not easy, when so many journalism shops have been so thoroughly hollowed out. It’s a whole different ball game.

And that’s also why I’m wondering whether it’s too late for Journalism Online’s three-legged stool to do much good for all but the big guys.

Advertisements

10 Responses to “Could JournalismOnline.com save the Marin Independent Journal?”


  1. […] the lines at JO’s real intent. Steve Katz of Mother Jones shares my speculation when he wrote on his blog today, after reading the Seward interview with Brill: “Towards the end of his article Seward […]

  2. Musca Law Says:

    How do I reset my password?
    Thanks
    Musca Law
    Musca Law

  3. Car insurance claims >> http://onlinecarinsuranceclaims.com/ Says:

    [… – maimonidesladder.com is another must see website of information. Online Car insurance claims [… –

  4. bourritouct Says:

    I do think this is a most incredible website for proclaiming great wonders of Our God!

  5. pc-rus.ru Says:

    скачать фильм три скачать игры на телефон 5130

  6. Self Tanners Says:

    Light Silk Spray to aid in brushing and easy removal of any tangles.
    You also have to be at ease in your dress, able to glide down the
    aisle in it & look comfortable all day long. There is no reason to be self-conscious
    about your body in front of the woman, or man, who is tanning you.


  7. Cobras and Mambas inject Neurotoxic venom which will affect
    the nervous system and cause initial muscle weakness, blurred vision, difficulty in swallowing and breathing and eventually paralysis.

    Richard Avedon photos had also filled some of
    the finest magazines in the United States. s wedding day should not only be ideal but also be distinctive to her person character.


  8. Fruits are great and I would never discourage
    my patients from eating fruit, but if your objective
    is to lose weight then they have to be eliminated, as they prevent Ketosis.
    Each year multiple ideas of what will work in helping us lose weight fast, is tossed around the radio dial,
    internet, and television about as often as Nicolas Cage makes movies.

    It is so great to be able to run around with my kids again I can’t wait to start again and lose more.

  9. Rocco Says:

    Then You will see a download bar, Click on it and some verification will
    appear. Just end the verification to begin the download.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: